EchemDID: Difference between revisions

From Intelligent Materials and Systems Lab

(Created page with "'''04.09.2018:''' Testing with variable cut-offs: The default cut-off for the Coulombic interaction for the Qeq scheme used in EchemDID is 15 Å. Did tests with 20, 30,40.......")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''04.09.2018:'''
'''04.09.2018:'''
Testing with variable cut-offs:
'''Testing with variable cut-offs:'''
 
/home/kristian/sshfs/rocket/echemtest/validation/forces_capa/test_cutoff
 
 
 
The default cut-off for the Coulombic interaction for the Qeq scheme used in EchemDID is 15 Å. Did tests with 20, 30,40.... 100 Å with the distance between plates being 18 Å. Found out that at higher cut-off values, the scheme breaks down entirely. The force and charge distributions become increasingly unphysical. Probably better to use the pre-determined cut-off value parametrized for the force field, even though this might cause the known problems.
The default cut-off for the Coulombic interaction for the Qeq scheme used in EchemDID is 15 Å. Did tests with 20, 30,40.... 100 Å with the distance between plates being 18 Å. Found out that at higher cut-off values, the scheme breaks down entirely. The force and charge distributions become increasingly unphysical. Probably better to use the pre-determined cut-off value parametrized for the force field, even though this might cause the known problems.

Revision as of 15:47, 4 September 2018

04.09.2018: Testing with variable cut-offs:

/home/kristian/sshfs/rocket/echemtest/validation/forces_capa/test_cutoff


The default cut-off for the Coulombic interaction for the Qeq scheme used in EchemDID is 15 Å. Did tests with 20, 30,40.... 100 Å with the distance between plates being 18 Å. Found out that at higher cut-off values, the scheme breaks down entirely. The force and charge distributions become increasingly unphysical. Probably better to use the pre-determined cut-off value parametrized for the force field, even though this might cause the known problems.